Edit Your Preferences
users can post new topics and replies to this forum
HTML is: Off
BBcode is: On
[quote] On 01-08-2008 16:31, royston wrote: I cannot disagree more with the idea of a merger. Having two MUDs (or possibly three if you count BL) is healthy. MUD is like a living organism. It develops and changes. If the ambience is bad in one resulting in it becoming unpopular and possibly folding, or it appears to be dying on its feet because the web site is not maintained and up-to-date, then that is the fault of the players for allowing it. The better MUD will survive. If half of what has been said about the atmosphere in MUD2 is correct (and it is a big ?if?) then following any merger I would expect them too comply to the way we behave. And why on Earth should they do that? If that is the way they want to play and it is the right way then they will survive without us. If the problem for us is that our player base is too small, (a moot point), the way forward to recruit brand new players. This is best done by word of mouth and by having a really attractive and active web site. One last point: If I am right in believing that MUDii is played mainly in the UK and MUD2 mainly in Canada and the USA, following a merger there?s going to be a lot of people playing at night. How on Earth am I going to sneak to Mage, let alone Wiz? [/quote]
on this Post
on this Post
(This can be altered or added in your profile)
These forums may be read by anyone, but only registered mudII.co.uk
players may post. When posting, please refrain from behaviour
not tolerated in the game.
These forums are moderated.
Copyright © 2000 - 2001
The phpBB Group
phpBB Created this page in 0.003693 seconds.